Thus, the better and more precise the technical specification for the standard is, the more likely it can mature to something useful. The world of software implementation is replete with examples. This assumption leads to differing interpretations that result in interoperability problems. One major issue in technical software standards is the temptation for the writers to simply assume that others understand what is meant by a particular function defined by the specification. The key quality attributes that determine the likelihood of a standard maturing into something approaching “plug and play” are specificity of the standard itself, optionality allowed, and industry agreement on what constitutes conformance to the standard. Unfortunately, the approval of a communication standard, such as OpenADR, IEEE 2030.5 or IEC 61850, is only the starting point. Once a standard for smart grid interoperation has been adopted by an official international standards development organization (SDO), such as IEEE or IEC, products developed to that standard should be able to easily communicate in order to work together – i.e., interoperate correctly with no additional integration engineering and debugging, also known as “plug and play”. When is a Smart Grid Standard Ready for Prime Time?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |